Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 12:17:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 12:16:57 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:22612 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 12:16:34 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by removal of To: andrewm@uow.edu.au (Andrew Morton) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:17:04 +0000 (GMT) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3A06C007.99EE3746@uow.edu.au> from "Andrew Morton" at Nov 07, 2000 01:28:23 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > It's a 16-liner! I'll cheerfully admit that this patch > may be completely broken, but hey, it's free. I suggest > that _something_ has to be done for 2.2 now, because > Apache has switched to unserialised accept(). Interesting > The fact that the throughput is 3-4 time worse for 2, 3, 4 and 5 > server processes is completely wierd. Perhaps some strange miss > pattern, but it doesn't do it on 2.4. I'll dump this problem > onto the netdev list, see if anyone has any bright ideas. That would be consistent with the fact that thttpd is single threaded and kicks apache for performance in 2.2 (less so 2.4!) > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/