Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268919AbUIMUEx (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:04:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268922AbUIMUEw (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:04:52 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:36823 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268919AbUIMUDi (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:03:38 -0400 Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 13:01:07 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Kirill Korotaev Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.9-rc1-mm5 Message-Id: <20040913130107.5230138b.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <4145BACE.8090005@sw.ru> References: <20040913015003.5406abae.akpm@osdl.org> <4145BACE.8090005@sw.ru> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 904 Lines: 30 Kirill Korotaev wrote: > > Hello Andrew, > > Please replace patch next_thread-bug-fixes.patch in -mm5 tree with the > last diff-next_thread I sent to you. I was planning on replacing it with Ingo's patch. --- linux/fs/proc/array.c.orig +++ linux/fs/proc/array.c @@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ static int do_task_stat(struct task_stru stime = task->signal->stime; } } - if (whole) { + if (whole && task->sighand) { Is there some reason why your patch is better? If so, please do a full resend. > And it looks like thread loop in do_task_stat() doesn't require siglock > lock, so you can add the patch attached to reduce lock area. hm, OK. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/