Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269203AbUINIVL (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Sep 2004 04:21:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269237AbUINIVB (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Sep 2004 04:21:01 -0400 Received: from dialup-4.246.93.207.Dial1.SanJose1.Level3.net ([4.246.93.207]:61056 "EHLO nofear.bounceme.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269201AbUINIUr (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Sep 2004 04:20:47 -0400 Reply-To: From: "C.Y.M." To: "'Jens Axboe'" Cc: , "'Alan Cox'" Subject: RE: Changes to ide-probe.c in 2.6.9-rc2 causing improper detection Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 01:20:21 -0700 Organization: CooLNeT Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Thread-Index: AcSaKuS7nVobyvWZSCCSRVMFZYOtaAACFDEg In-Reply-To: <20040914071555.GJ2336@suse.de> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 653 Lines: 22 > > Forgot to attach the code, here it is... > When I use your test application on the disabled drives, I get the following results: issuing FLUSH_CACHE: worked issuing FLUSH_CACHE_EXT: failed 0x51/0x4! Is FLUSH_CACHE_EXT also a requirement? Would it not be possible to just add this test function to ide-probe.c instead of looking for what the drive may or may not be advertising properly? -- C.Y.M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/