Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269706AbUINUT2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Sep 2004 16:19:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269734AbUINUSu (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Sep 2004 16:18:50 -0400 Received: from holomorphy.com ([207.189.100.168]:60053 "EHLO holomorphy.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269699AbUINTXM (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Sep 2004 15:23:12 -0400 Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 12:23:03 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Jesse Barnes Cc: Andrea Arcangeli , Andrew Morton , Ray Bryant , hawkes@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au Subject: Re: [profile] amortize atomic hit count increments Message-ID: <20040914192303.GD9106@holomorphy.com> References: <20040913015003.5406abae.akpm@osdl.org> <20040914155103.GR9106@holomorphy.com> <20040914160531.GP4180@dualathlon.random> <200409140916.48786.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> <20040914190030.GZ9106@holomorphy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040914190030.GZ9106@holomorphy.com> Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1373 Lines: 28 On Tuesday, September 14, 2004 9:05 am, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: >>> Before dedicidng I'd suggest to have a look and see how the below patch >>> compares to your approch in performance terms. On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 09:16:48AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: >> It looks like the 512p we have here is pretty heavily reserved this >> week, so I'm not sure if I'll be able to test this (someone else >> might, John?). I think the balance we're looking for is between >> simplicity and non-brokenness. Builtin profiling is *supposed* to be >> simple and dumb, and were it not for the readprofile times, I'd say >> per-cpu would be the way to go just because it retains the >> simplicity of the current approach while allowing it to work on >> large machines (as well as limiting the performance impact of >> builtin profiling in general). wli's approach seems like a >> reasonable tradeoff though, assuming what you suggest doesn't work. On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 12:00:30PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > Goddamn fscking short-format VHPT crap. Rusty, how the hell do I > hotplug-ize this? Successfully tested on x86-64. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/