Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269515AbUINSMx (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Sep 2004 14:12:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269662AbUINSJb (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Sep 2004 14:09:31 -0400 Received: from ns9.hostinglmi.net ([213.194.149.146]:23210 "EHLO ns9.hostinglmi.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269605AbUINR7X (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Sep 2004 13:59:23 -0400 Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 20:01:24 +0200 From: DervishD To: Tom Fredrik Blenning Klaussen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: /proc/config reducing kernel image size Message-ID: <20040914180124.GA624@DervishD> Mail-Followup-To: Tom Fredrik Blenning Klaussen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1095179606.11939.22.camel@host-81-191-110-70.bluecom.no> <20040914172646.GA614@DervishD> <1095183412.1834.7.camel@host-81-191-110-70.bluecom.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1095183412.1834.7.camel@host-81-191-110-70.bluecom.no> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: DervishD X-PopBeforeSMTPSenders: raul@dervishd.net X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ns9.hostinglmi.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - dervishd.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1454 Lines: 37 Hi Tom :) * Tom Fredrik Blenning Klaussen dixit: > > > There is no point in storing all the comments and unused options in the > > > kernel image. This typically reduces the config size to about 1/5th > > > before compressing, and to about 1/4th after compressing. > > I'm with you in that there is no point in storing the comments, > > but I disagree about the unused options. Storing the unused options > > as comments is more useful than it seems ;) > This is why I added a config option. But removing the comments is a good idea. Even reformatting the contents, or something like that. > > I'm not really sure about it, but I think that the unset options > > are left as comments for the sake of automation. The space saving > > doesn't (IMHO) worth the pain. > I'm not sure either, but I don't know of any programs that uses this. Neither do I. > Putting this config file inside the same source tree as it was compiled > with, and then just starting and stopping menuconfig will restore it to > it's original form. That's true. Ra?l N??ez de Arenas Coronado -- Linux Registered User 88736 http://www.pleyades.net & http://raul.pleyades.net/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/