Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266749AbUIOCXk (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:23:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266870AbUIOCXk (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:23:40 -0400 Received: from mail.broadpark.no ([217.13.4.2]:10652 "EHLO mail.broadpark.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266749AbUIOCXf (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:23:35 -0400 Message-ID: <4147A820.5090107@linux-user.net> Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 04:25:36 +0200 From: Daniel Andersen User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (X11/20040519) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roman Zippel Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] README (resend) - Explain new 2.6.xx.x version number References: <41476413.1060100@linux-user.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 915 Lines: 28 Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Daniel Andersen wrote: > > >>This one ended up in the void last time without any comments. > > > The funny thing is by the time people managed to apply the patch > correctly, they don't need to read the README anymore. > Seriously, without knowing about the pre-patches, what would you expect > about the patch order if you found the patches 2.6.8, 2.6.8.1, 2.6.9? > > bye, Roman I'm not sure what you really mean to say. And I'm not expecting anything. I wrote the patch because I see people ask, even on this list, if 2.6.9 is to be applied against 2.6.8 or 2.6.8.1. Whats the trouble? Daniel Andersen -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/