Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264396AbUIOKND (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Sep 2004 06:13:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264500AbUIOKND (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Sep 2004 06:13:03 -0400 Received: from MAIL.13thfloor.at ([212.16.62.51]:50142 "EHLO mail.13thfloor.at") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264396AbUIOKLL (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Sep 2004 06:11:11 -0400 Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 12:11:10 +0200 From: Herbert Poetzl To: Tom Fredrik Blenning Klaussen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: /proc/config reducing kernel image size Message-ID: <20040915101110.GA12585@MAIL.13thfloor.at> Mail-Followup-To: Tom Fredrik Blenning Klaussen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1095179606.11939.22.camel@host-81-191-110-70.bluecom.no> <20040914172646.GA614@DervishD> <1095183412.1834.7.camel@host-81-191-110-70.bluecom.no> <20040914180124.GA624@DervishD> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20040914180124.GA624@DervishD> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2067 Lines: 53 On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 08:01:24PM +0200, DervishD wrote: > Hi Tom :) > > * Tom Fredrik Blenning Klaussen dixit: > > > > There is no point in storing all the comments and unused options in the > > > > kernel image. This typically reduces the config size to about 1/5th > > > > before compressing, and to about 1/4th after compressing. > > > I'm with you in that there is no point in storing the comments, > > > but I disagree about the unused options. Storing the unused options > > > as comments is more useful than it seems ;) > > This is why I added a config option. > > But removing the comments is a good idea. Even reformatting the > contents, or something like that. > > > > I'm not really sure about it, but I think that the unset options > > > are left as comments for the sake of automation. The space saving > > > doesn't (IMHO) worth the pain. > > I'm not sure either, but I don't know of any programs that uses this. > > Neither do I. well, the kernel config uses it, to decide if some option is known, or has to be defaulted/asked try to remove one of those 'comments' from a config and run 'make oldconfig', you'll get asked for this specific option ... best, Herbert > > Putting this config file inside the same source tree as it was compiled > > with, and then just starting and stopping menuconfig will restore it to > > it's original form. > > That's true. > > Ra?l N??ez de Arenas Coronado > > -- > Linux Registered User 88736 > http://www.pleyades.net & http://raul.pleyades.net/ > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/