Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 16:50:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 16:50:23 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:16521 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 16:50:06 -0400 From: "David S. Miller" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15068.44155.12096.565071@pizda.ninka.net> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 13:50:03 -0700 (PDT) To: Jesse S Sipprell Cc: Jan Kasprzak , Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Possible problem with zero-copy TCP and sendfile() In-Reply-To: <20010417164407.B21620@bastard.inflicted.net> In-Reply-To: <20010417170206.C2589096@informatics.muni.cz> <20010417181524.E2589096@informatics.muni.cz> <20010417161036.A21620@bastard.inflicted.net> <15068.42539.768756.883953@pizda.ninka.net> <20010417164407.B21620@bastard.inflicted.net> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 13) "Crater Lake" XEmacs Lucid Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jesse S Sipprell writes: > On error, -1 is returned in the usual fashion and offset is purported to be > updated to point to the next byte following the last one sent. > > Will the zerocopy patches break this? No, they should not. Later, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/