Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:59:02 +0200
From: Luca Ferroni <fferroni@cs.unibo.it>
To: Patrick Kiwitter- Mailinglist <ccc@devilcode.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: monoholitic, hybrid or not monoholitic?
Message-Id: <20040915145902.77fda30a.fferroni@cs.unibo.it>
In-Reply-To: <4148271D.9050009@devilcode.de>
References: <4148271D.9050009@devilcode.de>
Organization: Ferrlabs
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1203
Lines: 31

Il Wed, 15 Sep 2004 13:27:25 +0200,  Patrick Kiwitter- Mailinglist <ccc@devilcode.de> ha scritto:

> the kernel were mostly descripted as monoholitic. but some sources means
> that the linux kernel is not really monoholitic because of the feature
> of loading kernel modules. some pages are talking about a "hybrid
> kernel" which means that the kernel is a glue one, a little bit of
> monoholitic and a little bit not.
> 

I think Linux kernel should be considered monoholitic anyway,
because, even it can load kernel modules, they execute themselves
in kernel privileged space.
You can compile some kernel parts as modules, 
so they belong to the Linux core, the only difference is that they
are loaded on demand implying all benefits and disadvantages we know.

Bye
Luca

-- 
----------------------------------------
They'll never steal us our .... FREEDOM!!!
Luca Ferroni
ICQ #317977679
www.cs.unibo.it/~fferroni/
----------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/