Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:49:19 -0700
From: Tim Hockin <thockin@hockin.org>
To: Robert Love <rml@novell.com>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
       akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] kernel sysfs events layer
Message-ID: <20040915214919.GC22361@hockin.org>
References: <1095279985.23385.104.camel@betsy.boston.ximian.com> <20040915203133.GA18812@hockin.org> <1095280414.23385.108.camel@betsy.boston.ximian.com> <20040915204754.GA19625@hockin.org> <1095281358.23385.109.camel@betsy.boston.ximian.com> <20040915205643.GA19875@hockin.org> <20040915212322.GB25840@kroah.com> <1095283589.23385.117.camel@betsy.boston.ximian.com> <1095284330.3508.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1095284369.23385.125.camel@betsy.boston.ximian.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1095284369.23385.125.camel@betsy.boston.ximian.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 903
Lines: 23

On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 05:39:29PM -0400, Robert Love wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 23:38 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> 
> > Anyone can watch the refcount on the fs-modules, they increment on every
> > device claim. Is that a leak in your eyes too :)
> 
> Haha, Kay, rocking point.

Not if I don't build my fs as a module?  And yeah, in the strictest sense
it IS a leak if a user can do that.

Now, I'm not *really* concerned withs ecurity, I just want to make sure we
don't flippantly disregard it.

I'd be happy if the actual block device was not part of the event.

What worries me more is that only some mount/umount calls get events, and
not all of them.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/