Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 12:27:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 12:27:15 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:61780 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 12:27:03 -0500 Subject: Re: rdtsc to mili secs? To: anton@linuxcare.com (Anton Blanchard) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:27:44 +0000 (GMT) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), andrea@suse.de (Andrea Arcangeli), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20001106091723.A516@linuxcare.com> from "Anton Blanchard" at Nov 06, 2000 09:17:23 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > This means our offset calculations in do_fast_gettimeoffset are way off > and taking a reading just before a timer tick and just after results in > a negative interval. Perhaps we should disable tsc based gettimeofday > for these type of machines. I seem to remember we have a 'notsc' option. Figuring out which boxes are infected with the problem may be trickier. We really need to be able to read the current CPU clock rate off whatever generates the clocks when we do a udelay - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/