Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 19:36:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 19:36:44 -0400 Received: from relay1.pair.com ([209.68.1.20]:25098 "HELO relay1.pair.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 19:36:28 -0400 X-pair-Authenticated: 203.164.4.223 From: "Manfred Bartz" Message-ID: <20010417233534.15466.qmail@logi.cc> Lines: 16 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: IP Acounting Idea for 2.5 In-Reply-To: X-Subversion: anarchy bomb crypto drug explosive fission gun nuclear sex terror In-Reply-To: Alan Cox's message of "Wed, 18 Apr 2001 00:13:30 +0100 (BST)" Organization: rows-n-columns Date: 18 Apr 2001 09:35:34 +1000 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) XEmacs/21.1 (Bryce Canyon) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox writes: > > > Fix your userspace applications to behave correctly. If _you_ > > > require your userspace applications to not clear counters, then fix > > > the application. > > > > You are confused. What would you say if a close() by another, > > No he isnt confused, you are trying to dictate policy. What then *is* the policy? AFAIK, no counters in the Linux kernel have resets, except in netfilter. -- Manfred Bartz - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/