Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268131AbUIPPHV (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Sep 2004 11:07:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268182AbUIPPFB (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Sep 2004 11:05:01 -0400 Received: from inti.inf.utfsm.cl ([200.1.21.155]:24510 "EHLO inti.inf.utfsm.cl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268130AbUIPO6u (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Sep 2004 10:58:50 -0400 Message-Id: <200409161458.i8GEwcAa028377@localhost.localdomain> To: Linus Torvalds cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Being more anal about iospace accesses.. In-Reply-To: Message from Linus Torvalds of "Wed, 15 Sep 2004 10:57:25 MST." X-Mailer: MH-E 7.4.2; nmh 1.0.4; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 15) Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 10:58:38 -0400 From: Horst von Brand Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1006 Lines: 27 Linus Torvalds said: > On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, J?rn Engel wrote: > > > > But it still leaves me confused. Before I had this code: [...] > No, you can certainly continue to use non-void pointers. The "void __iomem > *" case is just the typeless one, exactly equivalent to regular void > pointer usage. > > So let me clarify my original post with two points: [...] Could you please put the clarified message into Documentation? It would be a shame if it got lost. -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/