Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268311AbUIPXcw (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Sep 2004 19:32:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268405AbUIPX1Y (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Sep 2004 19:27:24 -0400 Received: from bay-bridge.veritas.com ([143.127.3.10]:47836 "EHLO MTVMIME01.enterprise.veritas.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268105AbUIPXWW (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Sep 2004 19:22:22 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 00:21:56 +0100 (BST) From: Hugh Dickins X-X-Sender: hugh@localhost.localdomain To: Anton Blanchard cc: akpm@osdl.org, Subject: Re: tmpfs in latest BK In-Reply-To: <20040916190633.GG2825@krispykreme> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1004 Lines: 30 On Fri, 17 Sep 2004, Anton Blanchard wrote: > > I just gave BK a try on my ppc32 laptop and tmpfs looks to be playing up: > > # mount -t tmpfs none /mnt > # ls /mnt > ls: mnt: Not a directory Bizarre. You think you've caught me indulging in silent semantic changes? > Does this ring any bells? :) It's alarming, but I don't recognize the bells. I blame the removal of SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN, that I copied from you ;) Seriously, it's fine for me on i386, has been in -mm for ten days, and I don't see what's architecture dependent about the changes. Nothing springs to my mind: may I ask you (or any others who find the same?) to delve into it? If I have any ideas later on, I'll mail again. Thanks - and sorry for this late and unhelpful response, Hugh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/