From: Kenneth =?iso-8859-1?q?Aafl=F8y?= <lists@kenneth.aafloy.net>
To: Roger Luethi <rl@hellgate.ch>
Subject: Re: [BUG] Via-Rhine WOL vs PXE Boot
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 14:52:51 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.7
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <200409172154.36550.lists@kenneth.aafloy.net> <200409180001.42332.lists@kenneth.aafloy.net> <20040918061331.GA12757@k3.hellgate.ch>
In-Reply-To: <20040918061331.GA12757@k3.hellgate.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200409191452.51507.lists@kenneth.aafloy.net>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 775
Lines: 17

On Saturday 18 September 2004 08:13, Roger Luethi wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 00:01:42 +0200, Kenneth Aafl?y wrote:
> > I've attached what I belive to be a bk patch (kinda new to that) which 
> > comments out this power-state change, untill something better is found. I 
> > have not tested WOL with this, but I can't think of any reason why it should 
> > not work.
> 
> I'm afraid you will convince neither me nor the hardware with assumptions.

WOL still works fine, at least with my hardware, without that statement.

Kenneth
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/