Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 08:08:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 08:08:21 -0400 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:32005 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 08:08:12 -0400 Subject: Re: Let init know user wants to shutdown To: chief@bandits.org (John Fremlin) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 12:55:26 +0100 (BST) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), andrew.grover@intel.com (Grover Andrew), linux-power@phobos.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de ("Acpi-PM (E-mail)"), pavel@suse.cz ('Pavel Machek'), Simon.Richter@phobos.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de (Simon Richter), aferber@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de (Andreas Ferber), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "John Fremlin" at Apr 18, 2001 02:56:56 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I'm wondering if that veto business is really needed. Why not reject > *all* APM rejectable events, and then let the userspace event handler > send the system to sleep or turn it off? Anybody au fait with the APM > spec? Because apmd is optional - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/