Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268980AbUIXVYg (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Sep 2004 17:24:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268961AbUIXVYG (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Sep 2004 17:24:06 -0400 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:29112 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268899AbUIXVWW (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Sep 2004 17:22:22 -0400 Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 14:22:08 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Ashok Raj Cc: Kenji Kaneshige , akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] add hook for PCI resource deallocation Message-ID: <20040924212208.GD7619@kroah.com> References: <41498CF6.9000808@jp.fujitsu.com> <20040924130251.A26271@unix-os.sc.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040924130251.A26271@unix-os.sc.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1651 Lines: 42 On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 01:02:52PM -0700, Ashok Raj wrote: > On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 05:54:14AM -0700, Kenji Kaneshige wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > This patch adds a hook 'pcibios_disable_device()' into > > pci_disable_device() to call architecture specific PCI resource > > deallocation code. It's a opposite part of pcibios_enable_device(). > > We need this hook to deallocate architecture specific PCI resource > > such as IRQ resource, etc.. This patch is just for adding the hook, > > so pcibios_disable_device() is defined as a null function on all > > architecture so far. > > > > I tested this patch on i386, x86_64 and ia64. But it has not been > > tested on other architectures because I don't have these machines. > > > > Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige > > > > Hi Kenji > > I think instead of modifying all the arch specific code, you could use the __attribute__(weak) > and define a default dummy funcion in drivers/pci/pci.c > > void __attribute__((weak)) pcibios_disable_device(struct pci_dev *dev) { } > > > each arch that really needs this can define the override function. > That way you dont need to put the dummy function in several places, > containing your changes to a very few set of files. Ohhh, nice. I like that option better. Kenji, care to respin your patches based on this change? thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/