Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S135444AbRDRWem>; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 18:34:42 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S135443AbRDRWec>; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 18:34:32 -0400
Received: from netsonic.fi ([194.29.192.20]:33806 "EHLO nalle.netsonic.fi")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S135445AbRDRWe0>;
	Wed, 18 Apr 2001 18:34:26 -0400
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 01:34:13 +0300 (EEST)
From: Sampsa Ranta <sampsa@netsonic.fi>
To: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Broken ARP (was Re: ARP responses broken!)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0104180131330.7698-100000@u.domain.uli>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0104190130490.27239-100000@nalle.netsonic.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


I have a rathar strange way to first ask and then try to find the answer
on my own. But what I found was:

from http://www.appwatch.com/lists/linux-kernel/Week-of-Mon-20010122/018588.html
> > am most curious about is how it ending up being removed from the kernel
> > in the first place.  It must have been a decision that someone made.
> > Either, we don't need that any more since we can do it this way, or
> > we'll take it out since nobody uses it.
>
> It was only submitted to 2.2 a few months ago (=years after 2.3 branched), but
> never added to 2.4.

So I wonder if this hidden feature or alike should be brought to 2.4 tree
also?

 - Sampsa Ranta
   sampsa@netsonic.fi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/