Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267455AbUIZCFl (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Sep 2004 22:05:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269476AbUIZCFl (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Sep 2004 22:05:41 -0400 Received: from out004pub.verizon.net ([206.46.170.142]:45700 "EHLO out004.verizon.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267455AbUIZCFi (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Sep 2004 22:05:38 -0400 From: Gene Heskett Reply-To: gene.heskett@verizon.net Organization: Organization: None, detectable by casual observers To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.9-rc2-mm3 breaks amanda (was: 2.6.9-rc2-mm3) Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 22:05:36 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 Cc: Matthias Andree , Andrew Morton References: <20040924014643.484470b1.akpm@osdl.org> <200409251437.17017.gene.heskett@verizon.net> <20040925213039.GB480@merlin.emma.line.org> In-Reply-To: <20040925213039.GB480@merlin.emma.line.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409252205.36750.gene.heskett@verizon.net> X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out004.verizon.net from [151.205.50.119] at Sat, 25 Sep 2004 21:05:37 -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2337 Lines: 50 On Saturday 25 September 2004 17:30, Matthias Andree wrote: >On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Gene Heskett wrote: >> Sounds to me as if amanda isn't setup correctly. its working here >> just fine with 1 server and 2 clients, one of which is the server >> itself. Running version 2.4.5b1-20040915 to virtual tapes on a >> big disk. > >Is Amanda set up incorrectly if SuSE's default 2.6.5 kernel and a >vanilla 2.6.7 work well even with clients, but 2.6.9-rc2-mm1 to -mm3 >versions fail at the same task, with the same Amanda installation > and software? > >I only exchanged the kernel, nothing else. Same hardware, same >user-space software. > >I doubt that it's Amanda's configuration. I'd expect a "stable" >2.6.9-whatever kernel to be backwards compatible with its 2.6.X >predecessors. I build amanda from tarballs for exactly that reason, and I do it everytime Jean-Louis releases a new tarball on his web page at umontreal.edu. I have, over the years, come from a 2.2 kernel and amanda-2.4.1, to 2.6.9-rc2-mm3 and amanda-2.4.5b1-20040915, building about 1/4th of the test kernels released, half of the amanda snapshots and have never, ever had a problem I could blame on a kernel version. Tape changer problems out the wahzoo, finally giving up and converting to a large disk drive that is except for a gig of swap, all amanda's to play in as she sees fit. If you play by amanda's rules, she is a very diligent servant. I'd bet a bottle of suds that there is something in the docs that tells you how to make amanda run, and that you have skipped over. Please re-read them again. Also, there is an amanda support group, amanda-users@amanda.org, where some user like me, or any of the authors can probably fix you right up. -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) 99.26% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly Yahoo.com attorneys please note, additions to this message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2004 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/