Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 19:50:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 19:50:34 -0400 Received: from [202.77.223.60] ([202.77.223.60]:50189 "HELO server.achan.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 19:50:23 -0400 Message-ID: <007d01c0c862$3fa67e40$093d9ecd@outblaze.com> From: "Andrew Chan" To: In-Reply-To: <3ADA5C4C.748D0916@home.com> Subject: How to tune TCP for heavily loaded sendmail box Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 07:49:45 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Greetings, I am running a relaying sendmail box and I would like it to be able to handle up to 600 or so concurrent (incoming or outgoing) connections. I tried that and discovered that TONS of incoming connections are stuck at SYNC_RECV state. It is like the sendmail box received these port 25 connection attempts and then didn't know what to do with them. I suspect I need to tune some of the TCP parameters so that the system can handle many short lived TCP connections in an efficent manner. Any pointer to this specific issue or general TCP tunning under Linux (2.4.2-ac28 kernel) will be most appreciated. Thanks. Andrew - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/