Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267301AbUI0VY0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Sep 2004 17:24:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267323AbUI0Umb (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:42:31 -0400 Received: from modemcable166.48-200-24.mc.videotron.ca ([24.200.48.166]:39315 "EHLO xanadu.home") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267356AbUI0UhV (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:37:21 -0400 Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:37:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-X-Sender: nico@xanadu.home To: Christoph Hellwig cc: Linux Kernel List , Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [RFC] ARM binutils feature churn causing kernel problems In-Reply-To: <20040927211750.A27684@infradead.org> Message-ID: References: <20040927210305.A26680@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20040927211750.A27684@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 757 Lines: 19 On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > From loooking at the gcc and binutils lists it seems codesourcery is pushing > through all the ARM EABI bullshit. Maybe we can persuade hjl to keep it > out of his bintuils release? So far we've been served far better with them > on Linux anyway.. Or maybe we should strongly suggest codesourcery to add a command line option to be able to disable those new "features" especially since they're not always welcome like for the Linux kernel build. Nicolas - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/