Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267686AbUI1NCT (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:02:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267536AbUI1NCS (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:02:18 -0400 Received: from 168.imtp.Ilyichevsk.Odessa.UA ([195.66.192.168]:62736 "HELO port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S267701AbUI1NCR convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:02:17 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Denis Vlasenko To: Norbert van Nobelen Subject: Re: [OT] Microsoft claim 267% better peak performance than linux? Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:04:13 +0000 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4] Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20040928075545.GA3298@cenedra.walrond.org> <200409281524.25187.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> <1096374908.21271.38.camel@linux.local> In-Reply-To: <1096374908.21271.38.camel@linux.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200409281604.13227.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 952 Lines: 25 On Tuesday 28 September 2004 12:35, Norbert van Nobelen wrote: > The document shows some interesting points though: > - They describe what they did to make redhat/apache perform better Yeah, like running 2.4.9 kernel... why not 2.0.0 kernel? ;) Also, see page 33: Operating System Key Exchange Algorithm Message Digest Windows Server 2003 RSA RC4 (128-bit) MD5 Red Hat Linux Advanced Server 2.1 Diffie-Helman 3DES (168-bit) SHA1 Red Hat Linux 8.0 Professional Diffie-Helman 3DES (168-bit) SHA1 and: ... Set HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\FileSystem\NtfsDisableLastAccess to 1. (but conveniently forgot to mount Linux partitions noatime) -- vda - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/