Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:50:37 +1000
From: CaT <cat@zip.com.au>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: acme@conectiva.com.br, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com,
       linux-net@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: strange network slowness in 2.6 unless pingflooding
Message-ID: <20040929055036.GA25016@zip.com.au>
References: <20040927090342.GA1794@zip.com.au> <41587A26.6020606@conectiva.com.br> <20040927224957.GA1043@zip.com.au> <20040927161845.1442bb4a.davem@davemloft.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040927161845.1442bb4a.davem@davemloft.net>
Organisation: Furball Inc.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1099
Lines: 27

On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 04:18:45PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> In particular, if there are hubs or switches involved on
> your local network that might be getting the duplex wrong,
> or some NAT or firewall machines in the path in question,
> please specify their setup precisely.
> 
> Otherwise there is zero chance of this problem ever being
> fixes.

Well I was going to do a few more tests and send a nice email doing just
that but in going through my package list with dpkg I spotted cpudyn and
cpufreqd installed. I've uninstalled them and now I cannot reproduce
the problem.

As such, and I hope I'm not speaking to you, it appears 'solved'. They
must've been interfering with the network layer somehow (or something)
and now that they are gone all's well.

My apologies if anyones time was wasted.

-- 
    Red herrings strewn hither and yon.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/