Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 09:49:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 09:48:40 -0400 Received: from passat.ndh.net ([195.94.90.26]:33017 "EHLO passat.ndh.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 09:48:36 -0400 Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 15:48:32 +0200 From: Alex Riesen To: LKML Subject: Re: missing poll(2) for semaphores Message-ID: <20010419154832.B8090@traian.de> Mail-Followup-To: LKML In-Reply-To: <20010419114646.B798@traian.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010419114646.B798@traian.de>; from a.riesen@traian.de on Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:46:46AM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Just an addition to the sample: fds[3] = sem3; fds[4] = sem4; fds[5] = sem5; fds[6] = sem6; .. and wait for any of them? or for all together? and sure have this mixed with descriptors. Wellknown win32 api WaitForMultipleObjects provides such functionality, and having something like that would help to port the applications using that api. On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:46:46AM +0200, Alex Riesen wrote: Hi, all i am missing a good (i think) feature of unix descriptors in SysV semaphores - to be poll(2)-able. Have someone an idea to somehow achieve the goal ? something like this: int sem = create_our_pollable_semaphore(); ... ... pollfd fds[xxx]; for(i=0; i < countof(fds); fds[i++].events = POLLIN|POLLOUT); fds[0].fd = sem; fds[1].fd = server_sock1; fds[2].fd = cmd_sock2; while ( poll(fds, countof(fds), -1) >= 0 ) ... Thank you in advance Alex Riesen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/