Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 07:33:01 +0200
From: Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>
Cc: "Miller, Mike (OS Dev)" <mike.miller@hp.com>,
       Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, mikem@beardog.cca.cpqcorp.net,
       marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
       "Baker, Brian (ISS - Houston)" <brian.b@hp.com>
Subject: Re: patch so cciss stats are collected in /proc/stat
Message-ID: <20041001053301.GE721@alpha.home.local>
References: <D4CFB69C345C394284E4B78B876C1CF107DBFE0B@cceexc23.americas.cpqcorp.net> <1096476186.2786.45.camel@laptop.fenrus.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1096476186.2786.45.camel@laptop.fenrus.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 964
Lines: 22

On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 06:43:06PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> I doubt you have many customers using 2.4.28.... I suspect that by now
> the majority of people is either using an (ancient) 2.4 vendor kernel or
> a 2.6 kernel. The very low number of reports on lkml about 2.4 seems to
> confirm that ...

You must be kidding, aren't you ? I would better say that the very high
number of reports on lkml about 2.6 seems to confirm that 2.6 still is
a toy !

Marcelo has done a great job at getting 2.4 stable, and now people are
installing it in remote locations or embedded system with no planned
updated at all. And it works. Just like people did with 2.0 recently.
This may be why there are so few reports.

Willy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/