Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269769AbUJAMgl (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Oct 2004 08:36:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269771AbUJAMgl (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Oct 2004 08:36:41 -0400 Received: from mail2.ewetel.de ([212.6.122.16]:65499 "EHLO mail2.ewetel.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269769AbUJAMgj (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Oct 2004 08:36:39 -0400 To: gene.heskett@verizon.net Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.9-rc3 In-Reply-To: <2Kmr3-9n-1@gated-at.bofh.it> References: <2K07b-1Ez-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <2Kh8e-5H2-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <2KjMz-6E6-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <2Kmr3-9n-1@gated-at.bofh.it> Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:36:35 +0200 Message-Id: From: Pascal Schmidt X-CheckCompat: OK Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1058 Lines: 23 On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 05:40:05 +0200, you wrote in linux.kernel: > Beats me, Clemens. But at the time, I got curious and the problem was > 100% repeatable using the bz2 src code files I had. The third time I > went after the srcs and patches to build that kernel, I got the .gz > versions of both, and they worked first time. Then I went back to > the .bz2's and was seeing the same problem as the first 2 downloads > gave me. I mv'd that src file & patch, went after the .bz2's again > (for the 3rd time), and that time it worked flawlessly. Both the 2nd > and 3rd dl's files had the exact same md5sum too. Go figure. bzip2 stresses the CPU much more than gzip does. Maybe there's a cooling problem, and of course you won't see error messages when the CPU starts making mistakes... -- Ciao, Pascal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/