Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 12:27:35 -0500
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: Robert Love <rml@novell.com>
Cc: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>, ttb@tentacle.dhs.org, akpm@osdl.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gamin-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [patch] make dnotify compile-time configurable
Message-ID: <20041001172735.GS31237@waste.org>
References: <1096611874.4803.18.camel@localhost> <20041001151124.GQ31237@waste.org> <1096644076.7676.6.camel@betsy.boston.ximian.com> <20041001083110.76a58fd2.rddunlap@osdl.org> <1096645479.7676.15.camel@betsy.boston.ximian.com> <20041001085823.05adc9b5.rddunlap@osdl.org> <1096650115.7676.20.camel@betsy.boston.ximian.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1096650115.7676.20.camel@betsy.boston.ximian.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 745
Lines: 19

On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 01:01:55PM -0400, Robert Love wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-10-01 at 08:58 -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> 
> > Sorry, that's about all that I was trying to say.  If patches A & B
> > are logically separate, don't combine them.  Nothing new there.
> 
> In this case I offer A or A&B.

The configurable dnotify patch makes sense on its own and is perhaps
less contentious. Push it first and resolve the conflicts with inotify
later..

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/