Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266467AbUJAVxK (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Oct 2004 17:53:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266555AbUJAVPR (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Oct 2004 17:15:17 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:51122 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266585AbUJAU4q (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Oct 2004 16:56:46 -0400 Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:00:13 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, piggin@cyberone.com.au, arjanv@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, haveblue@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: [RFC] memory defragmentation to satisfy high order allocations Message-Id: <20041001140013.5e3afc59.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20041001190430.GA4372@logos.cnet> References: <20041001182221.GA3191@logos.cnet> <20041001131147.3780722b.akpm@osdl.org> <20041001190430.GA4372@logos.cnet> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 537 Lines: 13 Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > As far as I have researched, the memory moving/remapping code > on the hot remove patches dont work correctly. Please correct me. > > And what I've seen (from the Fujitsu guys) was quite ugly IMHO. That's a totally different patch. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/