Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266741AbUJAWni (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Oct 2004 18:43:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266684AbUJAWn3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Oct 2004 18:43:29 -0400 Received: from atlrel7.hp.com ([156.153.255.213]:15323 "EHLO atlrel7.hp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266663AbUJAWlH (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Oct 2004 18:41:07 -0400 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Sy@eeyore.fc.hp.com, Dely L Subject: Re: 2.6.9-rc2-mm4 - Getting dev->irq equals 0 Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 16:40:47 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200410011640.47357.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 884 Lines: 18 > I encountered a problem in running shpchp & pciehp drivers on > 2.6.9-rc2-mm4 kernel. With ACPI & MSI enabled in the kernel, I > got dev->irq properly for the hot-plug controllers. With ACPI > enabled and MSI not-enabled in this kernel, I got dev->irq > equal 0 for the controllers. With the same options set in > 2.6.8.1 & 2.6.9-rc2, things worked fine on the same system. Does it make any difference if you boot with "pci=routeirq"? I haven't looked at MSI recently, but it's possible that's sensitive to have all the IRQs programmed at boot-time. If that does make a difference, please send me the output of lspci and a dmesg. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/