Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267235AbUJBDu3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Oct 2004 23:50:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267263AbUJBDu3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Oct 2004 23:50:29 -0400 Received: from sv1.valinux.co.jp ([210.128.90.2]:33970 "EHLO sv1.valinux.co.jp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267235AbUJBDu2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Oct 2004 23:50:28 -0400 Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 12:50:55 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20041002.125055.74752207.taka@valinux.co.jp> To: piggin@cyberone.com.au Cc: marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@osdl.org, arjanv@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] memory defragmentation to satisfy high order allocations From: Hirokazu Takahashi In-Reply-To: <415E154A.2040209@cyberone.com.au> References: <20041001182221.GA3191@logos.cnet> <415E154A.2040209@cyberone.com.au> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 608 Lines: 20 Hello, > >For example it doesnt re establishes pte's once it has unmapped them. > > > > > > Another thing - I don't know if I'd bother re-establishing ptes.... > I'd say just leave it to happen lazily at fault time. I think the reason is that his current implementation doesn't assign a swap entry to an anonymous page to move. Thank you, Hirokazu Takahashi. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/