Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 12:44:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 12:44:33 -0400 Received: from neon-gw.transmeta.com ([209.10.217.66]:18955 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 12:44:26 -0400 Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 09:43:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Alexander Viro cc: Abramo Bagnara , Alon Ziv , Kernel Mailing List , Mike Kravetz , Ulrich Drepper Subject: Re: light weight user level semaphores In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Alexander Viro wrote: > > I certainly agree that introducing ioctl() in _any_ API is a shootable > offense. However, I wonder whether we really need any kernel changes > at all. I'd certainly be interested in seeing the pipe-based approach. Especially if you make the pipe allocation lazy. That isn'tr trivial (it needs to be done right with both up_failed() and down_failed() trying to allocate the pipe on contention and using an atomic cmpxchg-style setting if none existed before). It has the BIG advantage of working on old kernels, so that you don't need to have backwards compatibility cruft in the libraries. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/