Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267400AbUJBRen (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Oct 2004 13:34:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267446AbUJBRen (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Oct 2004 13:34:43 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:26555 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267400AbUJBRee (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Oct 2004 13:34:34 -0400 Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 13:06:58 -0300 From: Marcelo Tosatti To: Nick Piggin Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@osdl.org, arjanv@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] memory defragmentation to satisfy high order allocations Message-ID: <20041002160658.GC7501@logos.cnet> References: <20041001182221.GA3191@logos.cnet> <415E154A.2040209@cyberone.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <415E154A.2040209@cyberone.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 586 Lines: 21 On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 12:41:14PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > > > Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > > >For example it doesnt re establishes pte's once it has unmapped them. > > > > > > Another thing - I don't know if I'd bother re-establishing ptes.... > I'd say just leave it to happen lazily at fault time. Indeed it should work lazily. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/