Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267702AbUJCDhh (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Oct 2004 23:37:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267705AbUJCDhh (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Oct 2004 23:37:37 -0400 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:60569 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267702AbUJCDhf (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Oct 2004 23:37:35 -0400 Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 20:35:21 -0700 From: Paul Jackson To: dipankar@in.ibm.com Cc: akpm@osdl.org, nagar@watson.ibm.com, ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, efocht@hpce.nec.com, mbligh@aracnet.com, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, hch@infradead.org, steiner@sgi.com, jbarnes@sgi.com, sylvain.jeaugey@bull.net, djh@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, colpatch@us.ibm.com, Simon.Derr@bull.net, ak@suse.de, sivanich@sgi.com Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH] cpusets - big numa cpu and memory placement Message-Id: <20041002203521.4b43ed8c.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20041002145521.GA8868@in.ibm.com> References: <20040805100901.3740.99823.84118@sam.engr.sgi.com> <20040805190500.3c8fb361.pj@sgi.com> <247790000.1091762644@[10.10.2.4]> <200408061730.06175.efocht@hpce.nec.com> <20040806231013.2b6c44df.pj@sgi.com> <411685D6.5040405@watson.ibm.com> <20041001164118.45b75e17.akpm@osdl.org> <20041001230644.39b551af.pj@sgi.com> <20041002145521.GA8868@in.ibm.com> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1109 Lines: 26 Dipankar wrote: > For this to succeed, they need to be completely > isolated. Do you mean by completely isolated (1) running two separate system images on separate partitions connected at most by networks and storage, or do you mean (2) minimal numa interaction between two subsets of nodes, all running under the same system image? If (1), then the partitioning project is down the hall ;) But I guess you knew that. The issues on this thread involve managing resource interactions on a single system image. Just checking ... the words you used to describe the degree of separation were sufficiently strong that I became worried we were at risk for a miscommunication. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.650.933.1373 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/