Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268333AbUJDCYi (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Oct 2004 22:24:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268331AbUJDCYi (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Oct 2004 22:24:38 -0400 Received: from twinlark.arctic.org ([168.75.98.6]:61158 "EHLO twinlark.arctic.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268346AbUJDCYc (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Oct 2004 22:24:32 -0400 Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 19:24:31 -0700 (PDT) From: dean gaudet To: Marcus Metzler cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Efficeon In-Reply-To: <16735.62032.169017.247720@mocm.de> Message-ID: References: <16735.62032.169017.247720@mocm.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 561 Lines: 15 On Sun, 3 Oct 2004, Marcus Metzler wrote: > I was just wondering which CPU options I should choose for compiling a > kernel for an Efficeon? > Crusoe seems to work fine. crusoe is similar to a 586 whereas efficeon is similar to a p4. i use either pentium4 or pentium-m (or 686 if i want a generic kernel). -dean - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/