Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 14:49:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 14:49:05 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:65033 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 14:48:50 -0400 Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 20:48:19 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: AJ Lewis Cc: Jes Sorensen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-openlvm@nl.linux.org, Arjan van de Ven , Martin Kasper Petersen , riel@conectiva.com.br, linux-lvm@sistina.com Subject: Re: [repost] Announce: Linux-OpenLVM mailing list Message-ID: <20010419204819.D30135@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20010419132927.D10345@sistina.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010419132927.D10345@sistina.com>; from lewis@sistina.com on Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 01:29:27PM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 19 2001, AJ Lewis wrote: > It is unfortunate that this could not have been resolved in a more mature > manner. Saying "I don't like the way somebody is doing something. I won't > bother to talk to them about it, I'll just flame them and try to undermine > their work." is not acceptable. It would have been nice if you'd actually > tried to work this out instead of handling it this way. LVM concerns us all now that it is not just an addon, but actually a part of the kernel. Rejecting mails and reports from users and developers who just might be able to lend you a hand fixing bugs, is not just counter productive it's downright rude! Besides, I didn't think the posting was flame material at all. If nothing else, it's a wake up call. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/