Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268019AbUJDTQJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Oct 2004 15:16:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268474AbUJDTQI (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Oct 2004 15:16:08 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:434 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268019AbUJDTHz (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Oct 2004 15:07:55 -0400 Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 12:05:35 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Jason Stubbs Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PROBLEM: Consistent lock up on >=2.6.8 Message-Id: <20041004120535.3c68115a.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <200410041931.00159.jstubbs@work-at.co.jp> References: <200410041611.17000.jstubbs@work-at.co.jp> <20041004013548.26e853fc.akpm@osdl.org> <200410041931.00159.jstubbs@work-at.co.jp> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2989 Lines: 97 Jason Stubbs wrote: > > [] nr_blockdev_pages+0x10/0x51 > [] update_defense_level+0x16/0x22a [ip_vs] > [] defense_timer_handler+0x8/0x2f [ip_vs] > [] run_timer_softirq+0xd4/0x17d > [] __do_softirq+0xb9/0xcb > [] do_softirq+0x4f/0x5e Yeah, that'll deadlock for sure. Please try this: update_defense_level() is calling si_meminfo() from timer context. But si_meminfo takes non-irq-safe locks. Move it all to keventd context. Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- 25-akpm/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c | 19 ++++++++----------- 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff -puN net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c~ipvs-deadlock-fix net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c --- 25/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c~ipvs-deadlock-fix 2004-10-04 11:59:01.138835688 -0700 +++ 25-akpm/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c 2004-10-04 12:03:07.790338960 -0700 @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ #include #include #include -#include +#include #include #include #include @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ int ip_vs_get_debug_level(void) #endif /* - * update_defense_level is called from timer bh and from sysctl. + * update_defense_level is called from keventd and from sysctl. */ static void update_defense_level(void) { @@ -211,19 +211,19 @@ static void update_defense_level(void) /* * Timer for checking the defense */ -static struct timer_list defense_timer; #define DEFENSE_TIMER_PERIOD 1*HZ +static void defense_work_handler(void *data); +static DECLARE_WORK(defense_work, defense_work_handler, NULL); -static void defense_timer_handler(unsigned long data) +static void defense_work_handler(void *data) { update_defense_level(); if (atomic_read(&ip_vs_dropentry)) ip_vs_random_dropentry(); - mod_timer(&defense_timer, jiffies + DEFENSE_TIMER_PERIOD); + schedule_delayed_work(&defense_work, DEFENSE_TIMER_PERIOD); } - int ip_vs_use_count_inc(void) { @@ -2361,10 +2361,7 @@ int ip_vs_control_init(void) ip_vs_new_estimator(&ip_vs_stats); /* Hook the defense timer */ - init_timer(&defense_timer); - defense_timer.function = defense_timer_handler; - defense_timer.expires = jiffies + DEFENSE_TIMER_PERIOD; - add_timer(&defense_timer); + schedule_delayed_work(&defense_work, DEFENSE_TIMER_PERIOD); LeaveFunction(2); return 0; @@ -2375,7 +2372,7 @@ void ip_vs_control_cleanup(void) { EnterFunction(2); ip_vs_trash_cleanup(); - del_timer_sync(&defense_timer); + cancel_delayed_work(&defense_work); ip_vs_kill_estimator(&ip_vs_stats); unregister_sysctl_table(sysctl_header); proc_net_remove("ip_vs_stats"); _ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/