Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269101AbUJENks (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Oct 2004 09:40:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269106AbUJENkr (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Oct 2004 09:40:47 -0400 Received: from iPass.cambridge.arm.com ([193.131.176.58]:42999 "EHLO cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269101AbUJENkW (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Oct 2004 09:40:22 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC] ARM binutils feature churn causing kernel problems From: Richard Earnshaw To: Russell King Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas , Rusty Russell , Sam Ravnborg In-Reply-To: <20041005141452.B6910@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20040927210305.A26680@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20041001211106.F30122@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <1096931899.32500.37.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20041005125324.A6910@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <1096981035.14574.20.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> <20041005141452.B6910@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1096983608.14574.32.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 14:40:08 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1579 Lines: 37 On Tue, 2004-10-05 at 14:14, Russell King wrote: > > Why don't you pass s to is_arm_mapping_symbol and have it do the same > > thing as you've done in get_ksymbol? > > "sym_entry" is not an ELF symtab structure - it's a parsed version > of the `nm' output, and as such does not contain the symbol type nor > binding information. > Ah. That makes the question in your previous message make more sense then. What options do you pass to nm? Looking at the output of nm -fsysv shows that currently the mapping symbols are being incorrectly typed (the EABI requires them to be STT_NOTYPE, but the previous ELF specification -- not supported by GNU utils -- required them to be typed by the data they addressed. I'll submit a patch for that shortly). > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > This e-mail message is intended for the addressee(s) only and may > > contain information that is the property of, and/or subject to a > > ... > Does this apply to your message? It would appear that third parties > subscribed to linux-kernel are not allowed to read your messages > because they're not an "intended recipient" ! In this case no, which is why I reposted the message without it. It was an oversight (I have to remove the boilerplate when I *don't* need it rather than add it when I do). R. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/