Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266838AbUJFD5P (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Oct 2004 23:57:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266876AbUJFD5P (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Oct 2004 23:57:15 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:36783 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266838AbUJFD5N (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Oct 2004 23:57:13 -0400 Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 20:55:11 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: "Chen, Kenneth W" Cc: mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au Subject: Re: Default cache_hot_time value back to 10ms Message-Id: <20041005205511.7746625f.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <200410060042.i960gn631637@unix-os.sc.intel.com> References: <200410060042.i960gn631637@unix-os.sc.intel.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 566 Lines: 12 "Chen, Kenneth W" wrote: > > This value was default to 10ms before domain scheduler, why does domain > scheduler need to change it to 2.5ms? And on what bases does that decision > take place? We are proposing change that number back to 10ms. It sounds like this needs to be runtime tunable? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/