Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267170AbUJFEaW (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Oct 2004 00:30:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267180AbUJFEaV (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Oct 2004 00:30:21 -0400 Received: from smtp205.mail.sc5.yahoo.com ([216.136.129.95]:35199 "HELO smtp205.mail.sc5.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S267170AbUJFEaS (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Oct 2004 00:30:18 -0400 Message-ID: <416374D5.50200@yahoo.com.au> Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 14:30:13 +1000 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040820 Debian/1.7.2-4 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: "Chen, Kenneth W" , mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Default cache_hot_time value back to 10ms References: <200410060042.i960gn631637@unix-os.sc.intel.com> <20041005205511.7746625f.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20041005205511.7746625f.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 823 Lines: 21 Andrew Morton wrote: > "Chen, Kenneth W" wrote: > >>This value was default to 10ms before domain scheduler, why does domain >> scheduler need to change it to 2.5ms? And on what bases does that decision >> take place? We are proposing change that number back to 10ms. > > > It sounds like this needs to be runtime tunable? > I'd say it is probably too low level to be a useful tunable (although for testing I guess so... but then you could have *lots* of parameters tunable). I don't think there was a really good reason why this value is 2.5ms. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/