Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269731AbUJGHQT (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2004 03:16:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269723AbUJGHQS (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2004 03:16:18 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:57502 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269734AbUJGHPa (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2004 03:15:30 -0400 Message-ID: <4164ED05.4000608@pobox.com> Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 03:15:17 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040922 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com> CC: linux-kernel Subject: Re: Why no linux-2.6.8.2? (was Re: new dev model) References: <200410070308_MC3-1-8BB4-FF94@compuserve.com> In-Reply-To: <200410070308_MC3-1-8BB4-FF94@compuserve.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 548 Lines: 23 Chuck Ebbert wrote: > Jeff Garzik wrote: > > >>Thanks to BitKeeper no properly-tagged branch is ever dead. >> >>Anyone could make a 2.6.8.2 if they so chose. >> > > > But it would be pointless without offical blessing from Linus. Why don't you create a 2.6.8.2 and see what happens? :) Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/