Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266349AbUJGJrH (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2004 05:47:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269779AbUJGJrG (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2004 05:47:06 -0400 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:64918 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266349AbUJGJoN (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2004 05:44:13 -0400 Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 02:41:45 -0700 From: Paul Jackson To: colpatch@us.ibm.com Cc: mbligh@aracnet.com, pwil3058@bigpond.net.au, frankeh@watson.ibm.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@osdl.org, ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, efocht@hpce.nec.com, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, hch@infradead.org, steiner@sgi.com, jbarnes@sgi.com, sylvain.jeaugey@bull.net, djh@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Simon.Derr@bull.net, ak@suse.de, sivanich@sgi.com Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH] cpusets - big numa cpu and memory placement Message-Id: <20041007024145.4918bcc1.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <1097104915.4907.99.camel@arrakis> References: <20040805100901.3740.99823.84118@sam.engr.sgi.com> <20040805190500.3c8fb361.pj@sgi.com> <247790000.1091762644@[10.10.2.4]> <200408061730.06175.efocht@hpce.nec.com> <20040806231013.2b6c44df.pj@sgi.com> <411685D6.5040405@watson.ibm.com> <20041001164118.45b75e17.akpm@osdl.org> <20041001230644.39b551af.pj@sgi.com> <20041002145521.GA8868@in.ibm.com> <415ED3E3.6050008@watson.ibm.com> <415F37F9.6060002@bigpond.net.au> <821020000.1096814205@[10.10.2.4]> <20041003083936.7c844ec3.pj@sgi.com> <834330000.1096847619@[10.10.2.4]> <1097014749.4065.48.camel@arrakis> <20041005193953.6edc83b2.pj@sgi.com> <1097104915.4907.99.camel@arrakis> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 688 Lines: 17 Matt wrote: > I'm really glad to hear that, Paul. That unconstrained (ab)use was my > only real concern with the cpusets patches. I look forward to massaging > our two approaches into something that will satisfy all interested > parties. Sounds good. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.650.933.1373 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/