Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267423AbUJGRGP (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2004 13:06:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267540AbUJGREP (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2004 13:04:15 -0400 Received: from siaag1aj.mx.compuserve.com ([149.174.40.25]:38980 "EHLO siaag1aj.mx.compuserve.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267469AbUJGQlN (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2004 12:41:13 -0400 Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 12:37:30 -0400 From: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com> Subject: Re: Why no linux-2.6.8.2? (was Re: new dev model) To: Alan Cox Cc: linux-kernel Message-ID: <200410071240_MC3-1-8BB8-4BD1@compuserve.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 640 Lines: 19 Alan Cox wrote: > > But it would be pointless without offical blessing from Linus. > > Pray how do you thing the 2.0.x-ac kernel series started. Yes it > would be ".2ce" but people will judge code by whether it works and over > time. Another boutique kernel was not what I had in mind. If it weren't official there would probably be just one user: me. --Chuck Ebbert 07-Oct-04 12:39:34 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/