Subject: Re: 2.6.9-rc3-mm3: `risc_code_addr01' multiple definition
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
To: Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
       Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1097170149.12535.27.camel@praka>
References: <20041007015139.6f5b833b.akpm@osdl.org>
	<20041007165849.GA4493@stusta.de>  <1097170149.12535.27.camel@praka>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 07 Oct 2004 12:50:14 -0500
Message-Id: <1097171420.1718.332.camel@mulgrave>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 735
Lines: 19

On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 12:29, Andrew Vasquez wrote:
> Hmm, seems the additional 1040 support in qla1280.c is causing name
> clashes with the firmware image in qlogicfc_asm.c.  Try out the attached
> patch (not tested) which provides the 1040 firmware image unique
> variable names.
> 
> Looks like there would be some name clashes in qlogicfc and qlogicisp.

Is there any reason for these firmware image pointers not to be static? 
At least for these drivers which are single files.

James


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/