Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267514AbUJGSFI (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2004 14:05:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267551AbUJGSBk (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2004 14:01:40 -0400 Received: from jade.aracnet.com ([216.99.193.136]:33716 "EHLO jade.spiritone.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267514AbUJGR7b (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2004 13:59:31 -0400 Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 10:56:43 -0700 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Dave Hansen cc: Matthew E Tolentino , Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA , Linux Kernel ML , linux-mm , lhms , Andrew Morton , William Lee Irwin III , "Luck, Tony" , Hirokazu Takahashi Subject: Re: [PATCH] no buddy bitmap patch : intro and includes [0/2] Message-ID: <1343960000.1097171803@[10.10.2.4]> In-Reply-To: <1097165419.3625.54.camel@localhost> References: <1097163578.3625.43.camel@localhost> <1260090000.1097164623@[10.10.2.4]> <1097165419.3625.54.camel@localhost> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.1 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 587 Lines: 16 >> Makese sense on both counts. Would be nice to add the justification to >> the changelog ;-) > > Would you mind running these through your normal set of tests on the > NUMAQ? The last time I ran them, I didn't see a performance impact > either way, and I'd be good to check again. Makes no difference in performance that I can see. M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/