Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 22:47:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 22:46:46 -0400 Received: from runyon.cygnus.com ([205.180.230.5]:38552 "EHLO cygnus.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 22:46:37 -0400 To: Alexander Viro Cc: Linus Torvalds , Abramo Bagnara , Alon Ziv , Kernel Mailing List , Mike Kravetz Subject: Re: light weight user level semaphores In-Reply-To: Reply-To: drepper@cygnus.com (Ulrich Drepper) X-fingerprint: BE 3B 21 04 BC 77 AC F0 61 92 E4 CB AC DD B9 5A X-fingerprint: e6:49:07:36:9a:0d:b7:ba:b5:e9:06:f3:e7:e7:08:4a From: Ulrich Drepper Date: 19 Apr 2001 19:45:02 -0700 In-Reply-To: Alexander Viro's message of "Thu, 19 Apr 2001 21:35:02 -0400 (EDT)" Message-ID: Lines: 20 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.2 (Thelxepeia) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alexander Viro writes: > > If the new interface can be useful for anything it must allow to > > implement process-shared POSIX mutexes. > > Pardon me the bluntness, but... Why? Because otherwise there is no reason to even waste a second with this. At least for me and everybody else who has interest in portable solutions. I don't care how it's implemented. Look at the code example I posted. If you can provide an implementation which can implement anonymous inter-process mutexes then ring again. Until then I'll wait. If you implement something else I couldn't care less since it's useless for me. -- ---------------. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/