Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268239AbUJGUuZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2004 16:50:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268089AbUJGUhZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2004 16:37:25 -0400 Received: from zcars04e.nortelnetworks.com ([47.129.242.56]:55543 "EHLO zcars04e.nortelnetworks.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267958AbUJGUck (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2004 16:32:40 -0400 Message-ID: <4165A7E4.30206@nortelnetworks.com> Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 14:32:36 -0600 X-Sybari-Space: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 From: Chris Friesen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linux kernel Subject: Re: question on update_wall_time_one_tick() -- doh! References: <4165A379.7030706@nortelnetworks.com> In-Reply-To: <4165A379.7030706@nortelnetworks.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 566 Lines: 16 Friesen, Christopher [CAR:VC21:EXCH] wrote: > Thus, doing an offset of +512000, immediately followed by an offset of > -512000, will leave you with a significant negative offset. > > Is this the desired behaviour? Just realized this was the old adjtime() behaviour. Wasn't clear from the adjtimex() man page. Chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/