Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269872AbUJGW4i (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2004 18:56:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269875AbUJGWze (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2004 18:55:34 -0400 Received: from manson.clss.net ([65.211.158.2]:57049 "HELO manson.clss.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S269873AbUJGWdf (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2004 18:33:35 -0400 Message-ID: <20041007223334.10692.qmail@manson.clss.net> From: "Alan Curry" Subject: Re: UDP recvmsg blocks after select(), 2.6 bug? To: davem@davemloft.net (David S. Miller) Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 17:33:33 -0500 (EST) Cc: msipkema@sipkema-digital.com (Martijn Sipkema), cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com, hzhong@cisco.com, jst1@email.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, davem@redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20041007152400.17e8f475.davem@davemloft.net> from "David S. Miller" at Oct 07, 2004 03:24:00 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 752 Lines: 16 David S. Miller writes the following: > >I can't believe this thread has lasted this long. I think people >had cotton in their ears when I mentioned that every single 2.4.x >and 2.6.x existing system out there has this behavior, therefore >even if we changed the behavior some way today people still need >to handle this to work on all existing Linux systems. That argument sounds like "I broke something a few years ago, and nobody complained quickly enough, so I got away with it." It's not impressive. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/