Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268455AbUJGVVT (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2004 17:21:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262279AbUJGVRr (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2004 17:17:47 -0400 Received: from zimbo.cs.wm.edu ([128.239.2.64]:24803 "EHLO zimbo.cs.wm.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267740AbUJGU4k (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2004 16:56:40 -0400 Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 16:56:14 -0400 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" To: Chris Wright Cc: Andrew Morton , jmorris@redhat.com, serue@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] lsm: add bsdjail module Message-ID: <20041007205614.GA23824@escher.cs.wm.edu> References: <20041007040859.GA17774@escher.cs.wm.edu> <20041006232208.505ccacd.akpm@osdl.org> <20041007090645.U2357@build.pdx.osdl.net> <20041007114039.6e861b2b.akpm@osdl.org> <20041007115240.C2357@build.pdx.osdl.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041007115240.C2357@build.pdx.osdl.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1590 Lines: 38 > * Andrew Morton (akpm@osdl.org) wrote: > > Chris Wright wrote: > > > * Andrew Morton (akpm@osdl.org) wrote: > > > Which feature are you concerned over, the additional hook or the > > > new module? > > > > I am concerned about the presence of new code - simple as that. > > Understood. We do have time allotted for maintenance of LSMs, so not only am I interested in maintaining bsdjail on my own, but I don't even have to do it in my free time :) > > We need to be able to demonstrate that the new code is sufficiently useful > > to a sufficiently large number of people as to warrant the cost of > > maintaining it in the tree for the rest of eternity. > > That's fine. Serge, can you enlighten us with an idea of the users of > this code? I am "just a developer", and don't have ready access to any marketers. There was no customer demand which we were addressing. We just saw it as a very useful feature easy to implement. Some people have privately expressed interested in the patch over the last few months as I've been sending out patches. And as Chris has mentioned, the vserver community appears to be thriving, and should be partially (though by no means fully!) served by this module. If nothing else it should reduce the size of the patch they need to maintain. I wish I had a better answer... -serge - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/