Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 02:31:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 02:31:16 -0400 Received: from THINK.THUNK.ORG ([216.175.175.162]:24071 "EHLO think.thunk.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 02:31:06 -0400 Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 02:30:52 -0400 From: Theodore Tso To: Jeff Garzik Cc: tytso@valinux.com, Alexander Viro , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Dilger , Ext2 development mailing list Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] ext2 inode size (on-disk) Message-ID: <20010420023052.C5417@think> Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Tso , Jeff Garzik , Alexander Viro , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Dilger , Ext2 development mailing list In-Reply-To: <20001202014045.F2272@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20010419161003.E17837@snap.thunk.org> <3ADF4AC0.2485C0BC@mandrakesoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i In-Reply-To: <3ADF4AC0.2485C0BC@mandrakesoft.com>; from jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com on Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 04:29:52PM -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 04:29:52PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > tytso@valinux.com wrote: > > In the long run, it probably makes sense to adjust the algorithms to > > allow for non-power-of-two inode sizes, > > If you don't mind, does that imply packing inodes across block > boundaries? No, it means that padding the end of each block in the inode table so that inodes don't cross block boundries. (i.e., if the inode size is 150 bytes, then there's room for 6 inodes in a 1k block, with 124 bytes left over for padding.) - Ted - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/