Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269966AbUJHOOA (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Oct 2004 10:14:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269987AbUJHOOA (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Oct 2004 10:14:00 -0400 Received: from ex-nihilo-llc.com ([206.114.147.90]:35337 "EHLO ex-nihilo-llc.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269966AbUJHONy (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Oct 2004 10:13:54 -0400 Subject: Re: Maximum block dev size / filesystem size From: Aaron Peterson Reply-To: aaron@alpete.com To: Alan Cox Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <1097177960.31547.132.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1097180361.491.25.camel@main> <1097177960.31547.132.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-NRBJLMw8Vk/UxQGgKxLl" Message-Id: <1097244833.491.31.camel@main> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 10:13:53 -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1837 Lines: 49 --=-NRBJLMw8Vk/UxQGgKxLl Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 15:39, Alan Cox wrote: > On Iau, 2004-10-07 at 21:19, Aaron Peterson wrote: > > I work for a company with a 15 TB SAN. All opinions about the > > disadvantages of creating really large filesystems aside, I'm trying to > > find out what is the maximum filesystem size we can allocate on our SAN > > that a linux box (x86) can really use. >=20 > For 2.4.x 1Tb (2Tb works for some devices but its a bit variable) >=20 > > What I can't seem to find anywhere is whether the 2 TB block device > > limit has improved/grown with 2.6 kernels (on x86 hardware). Perhaps > > I've looked in the wrong places, but I haven't found anything. >=20 > 2.6 fixed this problem although it appears not for some specialist > cases. Last time I checked LVM logical volumes over 2Tb were reported > problematic. I've read that the other main difficulty besides block device size limits is problems with the ext2 management tools themselves. So, how would you rate my chances of using a 2.6 kernel with XFS (and xfs management tools of course) with a 5 TB filesystem? Probably not a well tested scenerio to say the least... Aaron --=-NRBJLMw8Vk/UxQGgKxLl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBZqCgeJcyAiXpNL8RAny5AJ972ej3GzHQhbxlbrcda8Ps0HybdwCdEqBN foeCyR6m0GlrcAsQQynSoy8= =32Rd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-NRBJLMw8Vk/UxQGgKxLl-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/